Aligning Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA) Thresholds with State Minimum Wages
A pathway to meaningful employment and economic inclusion for people with disabilities
Executive Summary
This policy proposal calls for the Social Security Administration (SSA) to revise how Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA) thresholds are calculated. Instead of relying on a static, federally determined benchmark, SGA should be indexed to the minimum wage of the state in which the beneficiary resides. This simple adjustment would eliminate regional inequities, reduce work disincentives, and create a more inclusive economic environment that supports self-sufficiency for individuals with disabilities—while also benefiting the broader public through increased tax contributions and reduced long-term dependence on government programs.
Targeted Challenge
The SGA threshold is the income limit that the SSA uses to determine whether a person is “disabled enough” to qualify for or retain Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI). As of 2024, the SGA for non-blind individuals is $1,550/month, regardless of where they live. However, states like California have significantly higher minimum wages, $16.50/hour as of mid-2024, which means people with disabilities can unintentionally exceed the SGA threshold by working as few as 23–25 hours per week at minimum wage.
This static federal cap results in:
A geographically inequitable system
A disincentive to work or accept promotions
A one-size-fits-all policy for a population with varying needs and abilities
Lost tax contributions and suppressed economic output
Policy Solution
MEI recommends adjusting the SGA threshold to reflect each state’s minimum wage, creating a more accurate and location-sensitive definition of "substantial" employment.
Proposed SSA Formula:
SGA = State Minimum Wage × 30 hours/week × 4.33 weeks/month
This formula assumes part-time, moderate employment as a healthy benchmark and gives individuals the freedom to participate in the workforce without being prematurely disqualified from benefits.
Economic Impact
1. Increased Tax Contributions
Raising SGA thresholds allows individuals with disabilities to work more hours legally and confidently, leading to:
Increased payroll tax (FICA) contributions
Higher federal and state income tax revenue
Increased consumer spending and local sales tax generation
2. Reduced Long-Term Government Spending
Individuals who gradually transition to stable work often:
Reduce or eliminate their reliance on SSDI/SSI by gaining financial independence
Require fewer public services (e.g., Medicaid, housing assistance)
Experience better health outcomes, reducing public healthcare costs
3. Stronger Workforce Participation
Employers benefit from a larger, more stable labor pool and can confidently hire disabled workers, offer longer hours or promotions to workers with disabilities, all without triggering benefit losses.
Implementation Pathways
Administrative Reform (Primary Approach)
SSA revises SGA calculations through rulemaking, using existing wage data from the U.S. Department of Labor
Annual SGA updates occur alongside SSA’s cost-of-living adjustments
Beneficiaries are notified of their state-specific SGA thresholds through the SSA portal or annual correspondence
2. Legislative Support (Secondary Approach)
If administrative change is not pursued, Congress could amend the Social Security Act through a bill such as the “State-Adjusted SGA Act”, formally authorizing state-indexed thresholds
Case Study
Jordan, 30, lives with mild cerebral palsy in California. He receives SSDI and recently began working as a front desk assistant at $16.50/hour. He works 20 hours/week, earning:
$330/week × 4.33 weeks = $1,428.90/month
He is just under the federal SGA limit of $1,550. If he accepts just one additional shift, he risks losing his SSDI benefits.
Jordans Current Total Income and Tax Contributions
On the left is a representation of Jordans total income and his tax contributions. Due to the current SGA:
Jordan is de-incentivized to work more hours
Over 50% of Jordans monthly income will be lost if he works extra shifts
Due to his essential need for low weekly hours, Jordan is seen as lazy, unreliable, and less dependable by employers - in addition to societal barriers due to his disability
Jordans Income and Tax Contributions - After Increasing SGA
On the left is a representation of Jordans total income and his tax contributions. Due to the NEW SGA Proposal:
Jordan is incentivized to work more hours, now working full time
Jordan still has over $8,000 to earn before crossing the SGA limit
This is at zero cost to the federal and state government since Jordans benefit has remained unchanged
Jordan’s tax contributions have nearly doubled
Jordan is incentivized to earn more money without fear of losing his benefit
Jordan can spend more money, increasing the quality of his life and his participation in his local economy
The Hard Truth
The average individual in Jordans situation would not look for work either because they face barriers of entry into the workforce or they fear losing their benefit.
Less than 23% of individuals with a disability have a job in the United States
In 2023, Social Security paid out 11.9 Billion Dollars
A common barrier to employment is the fear of losing benefits
Estimated 10 year Tax Revenue - Post SGA Raise
Model 1 - Currently Employed Individuals Increasing Work Hours by 10 per week
Model 2 - Creation of New Jobs & Tax Revenue
Model Information
Location: Nationwide
Population: Working individuals, receiving SSDI, increasing weekly hours worked by 10 hours, increasing income (after raise in SGA).
Population Size: 1.35% of current SSDI recipients (100,000 out of 7.4 Million, 2024)
Duration: 10 year forecast
Average Wage: $15/hr
Approximate Increase in Taxable Income Per Person: $7,800
New Estimated Tax Revenue Per Person: $3,120
Estimated Tax Revenue: $312,000,000/year
Accumulated Tax Revenue: 3.12 Billion Dollars
Cost to Federal Government: $0
Summary: Model 1 suggests by raising the current SGA to the resident state minimum wage, if even just 1.35% (0.135% per year), over the course of 10 years increased our gradually increased their working weekly hours by 10 - estimated increase in tax revenue from this population alone would be approximately 300 Million Dollars. This is a conservative estimate, as a substantial amount of the 7.4 Million (2024) currently work and remain under the SGA. Hitting the 1.35% target over a 10 year period should be a viable goal, especially with current workforce development programs already running throughout the country. Current workforce development
Model Information
Location: Nationwide
Population: Non-working individuals, receiving SSDI
Population Size: 3,000 per year
Duration: 10 year forecast
Average Wage: $15/hr
Average Weekly Hours: 20
Approximate Increase in Taxable Income Per Person: $15,600
New Estimated Tax Revenue Per Person: $3,000
Estimated Yearly Tax Revenue: $90,000,000
Accumulated Tax Revenue: $495,000,000
Cost to Federal Government: $0
Summary: In Model 2, a conservative projection of three thousand jobs out of roughly six million unemployed SSDI recipients could generate substantial new tax revenue, at no cost. Simply put, this model reelects 0.05% of the current population on SSDI gaining meaningful employment, year over year. This conservative model takes into account, population growth, job turnover, and overall low to moderate national employment rates. The reason for zero cost reflects the current infrastructure in place such as job skill and placement programs that job-ready or job-seeking individuals utilize.
Model 3 - Combined Value
Model Information
Location: Nationwide
Population: Non-working individuals, receiving SSDI
Population Size: 3,000 per year
Duration: 10 year forecast
Average Wage: $15/hr
Average Weekly Hours: 20
Approximate Increase in Taxable Income Per Person: $15,600
New Estimated Tax Revenue Per Person: $3,000
Estimated Yearly Tax Revenue: $90,000,000
Accumulated Tax Revenue: $495,000,000
Cost to Federal Government: $0
Summary: In Model 2, a conservative projection of three thousand jobs out of roughly six million unemployed SSDI recipients could generate substantial new tax revenue, at no cost. Simply put, this model reelects 0.05% of the current population on SSDI gaining meaningful employment, year over year. This conservative model takes into account, population growth, job turnover, and overall low to moderate national employment rates. The reason for zero cost reflects the current infrastructure in place such as job skill and placement programs that job-ready or job-seeking individuals utilize.